To paraphrase Tip O'Neill's "All politics are local," all HMOs are local.  I do not have to look far from New York City to see two examples of geographical differences from Manhattan (New York County) where 12 insurance organizations offer 28 HMOs and 9 PPOs–- to two neighboring counties – Suffolk and Nassau. 

Suffolk County in 2008 has four HMO organizations offering a total of seventeen HMO and PPO Plans.  Another neighbor, Nassau County, in 2008, has seven insurance organizations offering twenty one HMO and PPO plans for enrollment. 

Additionally, the monthly premiums in the total of thirty-eight plans in Nassau and Suffolk Counties range from $0 for ten plans to premiums of $24.10 to $99.50 for the twenty-eight remaining HMOs and PPOs -- whereas, in Manhattan (New York County), only four out of 37 HMO and PPO plans have premiums amounting to $24.10 to $85.

At this high point of participation in HMOs and PPOs, I believe it would be useful to give you their history (few PPOs up to 2002) – food for a thoughtful discussion on private health plans.  The following information is taken from my postings of 8/17/01 and 12/3/01 on HMO segment 5.

Suffolk County and Nassau County have come a long way since 2001 and 2002 – two low point years.  Suffolk County in 2001 had only two HMO organizations offering plans – one HMO offered one plan for enrollment, and the second offering two plans, announced a termination of the plans in the summer of 2000 but changed their minds after Thanksgiving.  This decision to remain in the market allowed over 11,000 members to continue in the HMO program.  Suffolk County in 2002 again had two HMO organizations offering three plans.  Nassau County in 2001 had four HMO organizations offering 8 plans and in 2002, three HMO organizations offered nine plans.

In July 2000, according to a fact sheet released then by the Health Care Financing Administration (the forerunner to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) 65 HMOs did not renew their contracts and 53 reduced their service areas for the year 2001.  This press release goes on to state that “This change affects more than 934,000 Medicare beneficiaries” and “About 775,000 of the affected beneficiaries will be able to enroll in another Medicare HMO, if the HMO is accepting enrollees.”  “…if the HMO is accepting enrollees” means if the HMOs have not yet reached capacity limits as result of the switching of beneficiaries who will be losing their current HMOs.  And the fact sheet goes on to state that “About 17 percent 

or 159,000 of the remaining beneficiaries will be left with no Medicare + Choice HMO options…”  It seems to me that the above statistics describe a volatile situation that may recur annually.

And in a 9/21/01 preliminary status report of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, twenty-two HMOs did not renew their contracts and thirty-two reduced their service areas for the year 2002.  This change affected approximately 536,000 Medicare beneficiaries (all HMOs except one PPO) or 10 percent of Medicare + Choice enrollees.  This press release goes on to state that most affected enrollees will have another HMO plan to select.  The exceptions will be 38,000, who have no option but to return to the Original Medicare fee-for-service program.  Just over 50.000 will have access to a Private Fee-for-service program. 

I went on to state in my second posting of 12/3/01 (HMO segment 5) that the above is a fair two year view, but I believe we need a wider view.  This was presented in the following abstract from a September 2001 report on Medicare + Choice by The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation:

“The number of HMOs available in the 1990s grew rapidly rising from 96 in 1990 to 346 in 1998.  In 1999 and each of the following two years, however, the number of plans participating in Medicare declined.  Today (2001), 178 M + C plans participate in Medicare.”

In my 12/3/01 posting on HMO segment 6 regarding the HMO picture in the five boroughs of New York City for 2002, I stated the following: “New York City has been fortunate with Medicare HMO non-renewals – only one HMO with 434 participants in just one of the city’s five counties, New York (Manhattan).”

As is my custom at the end of each subject, I suggest that you refer to the Resources Page for literature and personal assistance – and I particularly highlight web sites, to indicate the importance of this source of information.  I explained in the previous segment the importance of medicare.gov. in selecting an HMO or PPO.  Also, websites of various HMO organizations can give you a preview of the summary benefit brochures, before you receive the hard copy and in some cases give you additional information such as network of physicians and listings of covered prescription drugs.  It has proved to be a key tool, so I believe that all counselors and Medicare beneficiaries should learn how to access the Internet.  I realize that there are too many seniors who are not computer/internet literate, but training and access are available in libraries and similar community organizations –- so do try.  It can make a difference.

Updated: January 10, 2008

 

<<Previous Page

For comments, questions or feedback, please email to
senhealth@yahoo.com