Organizing Records
I would like to address the subject of employer or union retirement health plans. These plans vary -- they may include insurance similar to a standard Medigap policy or a secondary insurer having special rules before payments can be made to the beneficiary or provider. It is difficult to track the paperwork of the latter (secondary payer) plan because these plans generally have a higher deductible before co-insurance payments "kick in", and the payments may be 80% of the co-insurance amount; and once the company's qualifying medical coverage amount is reached, the co-insurance is paid in full.  An insurance claims record kept by the insured is especially suited for this situation and would be an aid to tracking of bills and claims. In the next segment (09) I will note the counseling assistance available to Medicare beneficiaries, which includes the use of the insurance claims record.

On the other hand, the Medicare beneficiary with standard Medigap insurance, or without any supplementary insurance, can create a file as a tool to monitor claims and payments.  Organizing such a Medicare file -- Medicare MSNs, Medigap EOBs and related documents has always represented a challenge.  Filing by date of service, using the month containing most of the services listed on the MSN or EOB, appeared to work the best – work the best prior to 2006 

But in 2006-2007 the challenge has become greater.  Instead of monthly Medicare Summary Notices (MSNs), beneficiaries in New York City have been receiving MSNs, with a few exceptions, covering claims processed during a 60-90 day period.  And in the fall of 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced effective October 29, 2007, MSNs will be mailed on a quarterly basis.  Since the timing of submission of claims and elapsed time of claim processing varies, those documents may include service dates of five or more different months, and by multi-providers. How would such a file work?  Filing by date of service is now out of the question.  There appears to be one choice – the filing of all documents must follow the processing sequence of the MSNs.  Searching for particular documents will be a daunting job, but it will be very important to your control of the claim and payment process. 

I had described a procedure for correlating the various documents (MSN, EOB and possible invoice) for each medical service, and closing out each case.  I have since discontinued that procedure because all the medical services on a Medicare MSN and Medigap EOB usually do not dovetail with each other.  The correlating process has now become even more arduous with the new quarterly MSNs.  The public and officialdom seem to have no knowledge of the “nitty gritty detail work” Medicare beneficiaries are faced with -- many already involved in problematic situations, medical or otherwise.

Therefore, I have suggested that the beneficiary correlate the MSN and EOB only for the situations mentioned below.  Since there will usually be other services on those documents, the correlation process then simply involves making an extra copy of those documents for each service under review. 

The beneficiaries should compare copies of the MSN and EOB with a provider’s invoice requesting payment of balance due, to check for accuracy.  Another type of case is when an invoice has been paid in full at time of visit, and a comparison with the MSN and EOB can prove whether the insured was properly reimbursed. 

I have attempted in the previous three web site segments, 05, 06, and 07 to present the information and methodology to help you do the above type of checking.  And if the bill demanding payment, or insurance reimbursement, still doesn’t make sense, click on to the next segment for help.

Updated: January 25, 2010

                     

 


<<Previous Page
      Next Page>>